Connect with us


Dasuki: Impunity on the prowl



Dasuki: Impunity on the prowl

TUNDE OYESINA writes on the Federal Government’s penchant for disobedience to court orders as consistently being demonstrated in a case involving detained former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki and the government


Again, the President Muhammadu Buhari-led government has refused to comply with the sixth order compelling the ruling government to allow home a former National Security Adviser to former President Goodluck Jonathan, Col. Sambo Dasuki.
Dasuki, who is facing corruption trial over an alleged N2.1billion arms deal and illegal possession of firearms, was for the sixth time granted bail penultimate week by Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu of the Federal High Court.
Justice Ojukwu’s court was the sixth court which had allowed Dasuki home on bail following his not guilty plea on the alleged N2.1 billion arms deal and illegal possession of firearms.
This, Dasuki pleaded not guilty as he was subsequently admitted to bail on six different occasions.
Although he had been denied bail on each occasion, the latest of the bail granted by Justice Ojukwu was again shunned by the Buhari government after Dasuki had perfected his bail condition with a release order served on the Department of State Security Services and the Attorney-General.
Despite compliance with his bail conditions, the Federal Government refused to comply with the court order on the grounds that the former National Security Adviser (NSA) was being detained in public interest as a result of the allegations against him.
According to the Federal Government, allowing Dasuki home on bail despite the order of court would breach public peace and interest as his rights was allegedly unimportant than over 100, 000 people he was “instrumental to their death.”
It specifically said the court order which compelled it to release Dasuki on bail would not be complied with as funds meant for the military under the former NSA had led to death of scores of Nigerians.
It said: “What I want you to know is that issues concerning law and order under Muhammadu Buhari are sacrosanct and obeying court order is compulsory.
“However you should also know that there is a general consensus world over that where the dispute is only between individuals, then you can consider the issue based on the instant situation. But if the dispute is about an issue that affects an entire nation, then you have to remember that government is about the people not for only an individual.
“So, you have to look at it from this perspective. If the issue about an individual coincides with that which affects the people of a nation and you are now saying the government did not obey a court order that infringes on a single person’s rights. Remember we are talking about a person who was instrumental to the deaths of over 100,000 people. Are you saying that the right of one person is more important than that of 100,000 who lost their lives?
“Reports have shown that there was massive mismanagement of funds meant for military hardware which the military could not access and that led to the death of many, embezzlement of the fund and because of that many people have lost their lives. Obeying the court is not the issue per say.
“Are we going to take the issue of an individual more important than that of the people? The government’s main responsibility is for and about the people. The essence of governance is to better the lives of its people. So you have to weigh it based on that; the rights of an individual or the rights of the people.”
But lawyers described the federal government’s refusal to comply with order of court as the height of impunity
Two Senior Advocates of Nigeria, Chief Mike Ozekhome and Ahmed Raji, however, pleaded with President Muhammadu Buhari to obey the court that admitted to bail the detained former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki especially when Dasuki’s bail conditions had been fulfilled as Nigerians were awaiting a positive response from the Federal Government and the DSS to the court order.
Raji said: “I am pleading and begging the Federal Government and DSS in the name of God Almighty to please comply with court order on my client, Col. Sambo Dasuki.
“We have served them with the court order and in the interest of justice and rule of law, I am begging this government, being a democratic government, to please respect the rule of law on Dasuki.”
To Ozekhome, President Muhammadu Buhari government has again “simply refused to obey the 6th bail order granted by Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which ordered the federal government to release Col. Sambo Dasuki who has been detained since December, 2015.
“For the records, this is the 6th court order, including ECOWAS’ release order, which this government has blatantly refused to obey.
“This is simply a government given to unparalleled impunity and executive lawlessness. And it does it so unabashedly and audaciously, believing that it possesses all the apparatchik of coercion and life and death over Nigerians. Obedience to court orders is the cornerstone of any constitutional democracy. The alternative is chaos and anarchy.
“Before Justice Ojukwus latest bail order to enforce Col. Dasukis fundamental rights, four different judges of Federal High Courts and FCT High courts had, at one time or the other, granted Dasuki bail. But, the PMB government refused to release Dasuki. Instead, it sat as an appellate court over the courts, inspite of the Doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in sections 4 (Legislature), 5 (Executive) and 6 (Judiciary), of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria, as altered and ably espoused in 1748 by Baron de Montesque.
“Justice Adeniyi Ademola and Justice Ahmed Ramat Mohammed of the Federal High Court, Abuja, including Justices Peter Affen and Baba Yusuf of the FCT High Court, had earlier granted Dasuki bail, but the government disdainfully refused to release Dasuki, even after Dasuki had fulfilled the bail conditions attached thereon. Frustrated, Dasuki had approached the sub-regional ECOWAS Court which also ordered his release. The government said no.
“We are having the dangerous situation where this government picks and chooses which orders to obey or disobey; an anarchical situation.
“The same government has so far refused to obey several orders for the release of the Shittes leader, El-Zakzaki. This is clearly against constitutionalism and the Rule of Law.
“The rule of law doctrine theorises, amongst others, that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable to law, the principle of government of law. The rule of law means that no person or government is above the law; that there is restriction of arbitrary exercise of power by subordinating it to well-defined and established laws.
“It means that no person, however, highly placed, is above the law, whether law makers, law enforcement officials, judges or persons in government. Cicero once famously declared that we are all servants of the laws in order to be free. In Leviticus, we are admonished (19:15), you shall do no iniquity in judgement.
“You shall not favour the wretched and you shall not defer to the rich. In righteousness you are to judge.
As espoused by A.V. Dicey, its greatest proponent, the rule of law means absolute predominance or supremacy of ordinary law of the land over all citizens, no matter how powerful.
“Let the President Buhari-led government hear it loud and clear that the rule of law means that legal duties and liability to punishment of all citizens is determined by the ordinary regular law, and not by any arbitrary fiat, government decree, or wide discretionary powers; and that disputes between citizens and governments are determined by ordinary courts of the land, not by the executive arm of government deciding what is right or wrong.
“The Supreme Court of Nigeria and other courts of superior jurisdiction, have emphasized, again and again, that orders of courts, even if unpalatable to the recipient, or even, if patently illegal or wrong, must be obeyed, except upturned on appeal, by a higher court. In GWARZO v. MOHAMMED & ANOR (2012) LPELR-22375(CA), the Court of Appeal held thus:
“It is, also, well entrenched that an order, no matter how unorthodox and unconventional, irrespective of whether or not the trial Judge was right to make it, is a subsisting order of the Court, unless it is set aside. Likewise, a judgment of a Court of law, no matter how incorrectly arrived at, subsists until set aside by a competent Court.
“In the case of EFCC v. DADA (unreported), decided on 31st December, 2014, in CA/L/463/2011, it was held thus:
“It is settled that orders of court must be obeyed, even if they are perverse.”
Also in the case of FAME PUBLICATIONS LTD V. ENCOMIUM VENTURES LTD & ORS (2000) LPELR-6833(CA), the Court held thus:
“Orders of a competent court must be obeyed as long as they subsist. They remain binding on parties thereto until set aside by a Court of competent jurisdiction or declared null and void as the case may beIt follows that once a party knows of an order of the Court, whether it be valid or not and whether regular or irregular or even perverse, he is obliged to obey it.
“Mr. President sir, in the name of almighty Allah, the Supreme God we all serve, let Dasuki go home on bail. Give him a breather. He has a family, friends and dependants to care for. He has not yet been convicted by any court of law. He is still presumed innocent under Section 36 of the Nigerian Constitution.
“Give him a lifeline. Help us build strong institutions, not strong men. I appeal to you sir, on my bended kneels. Let the milk of human kindness flow in you. Seek ye not vengeance. Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but give place unto wrath; for it is written, vengeance is mine, I will repay,

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Take advantage of our impressive online traffic; advertise your brands and products on this site. Call For Advert Placement and Enquiries, Call: Mobile Phone:+234 803 304 2915 Online Editor: Michael Abimboye Mobile Phone: 0813 699 6757 Email: Copyright © 2018 NewTelegraph Newspaper.

%d bloggers like this: